Evolution of computed tomography techniques
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70411/MJHAS.1.1.2024139Keywords:
A computerized tomography scan, image reconstruction and processing, imaging by sections, CT -Tomography, processingAbstract
Recently, computed tomography (CT) scanners, which combine X-rays and computers, have been developed and adopted globally as diagnostic tools. We found it necessary to chronicle the development of CT technology and identify the factors of their widespread application and the sequence of introduction and adoption of installed optical equipment, including the events that caused the advancement of these technologies and their impact on medical services. The twentieth century was full of scientific events and a wealth of information available to scientists and innovators worldwide, challenging the restrictions imposed on the space for technology transfer and the sharing of science and information that may limit coverage. Developments in emerging inventions and innovations. Through this paper, we review the main CT techniques developed. This work focuses on hardware and systematic evolution following the timeline associated with innovations that have contributed to image reconstruction technology.
References
Antonelli, F., Campa, A., Esposito, G., Giardullo, P., Belli, M., Dini, V., Meschini, S., Simone, G., Sorrentino, E., & Gerardi, S. (2015). Induction and repair of DNA DSB as revealed by H2AX phosphorylation foci in human fibroblasts exposed to low-and high-LET radiation: relationship with early and delayed reproductive cell death. Radiation research, 183(4), 417-431.
Carbonell Carrera, C., & Bermejo Asensio, L. A. (2017). Augmented reality as a digital teaching environment to develop spatial thinking. Cartography and geographic information science, 44(3), 259-270.
Ceccaldi, R., Rondinelli, B., & D’Andrea, A. D. (2016). Repair pathway choices and consequences at the double-strand break. Trends in cell biology, 26(1), 52-64.
Chong, S., Pan, G.-T., Chin, J., Show, P. L., Yang, T. C. K., & Huang, C.-M. (2018). Integration of 3D printing and Industry 4.0 into engineering teaching. Sustainability, 10(11), 3960.
Codd, A. M., & Choudhury, B. (2011). Virtual reality anatomy: Is it comparable with traditional methods in the teaching of human forearm musculoskeletal anatomy? Anatomical sciences education, 4(3), 119-125.
Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of science Education and Technology, 18, 7-22.
Ford, S., & Minshall, T. (2019). Invited review article: Where and how 3D printing is used in teaching and education. Additive Manufacturing, 25, 131-150.
Gerson, L., & Van Dam, J. (2003). A prospective randomized trial comparing a virtual reality simulator to bedside teaching for training in sigmoidoscopy. Endoscopy, 35(07), 569-575.
Josman, N., Ben-Chaim, H. M., Friedrich, S., & Weiss, P. L. (2008). Effectiveness of virtual reality for teaching street-crossing skills to children and adolescents with autism. International Journal on Disability and Human Development, 7(1), 49-56.
Ke, F., Pachman, M., & Dai, Z. (2020). Investigating educational affordances of virtual reality for simulation-based teaching training with graduate teaching assistants. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 32, 607-627.
Kong, X., Nie, L., Zhang, H., Wang, Z., Ye, Q., Tang, L., Huang, W., & Li, J. (2016). Do 3D printing models improve anatomical teaching about hepatic segments to medical students? A randomized controlled study. World journal of surgery, 40, 1969-1976.
Kysela, J., & Štorková, P. (2015). Using augmented reality as a medium for teaching history and tourism. Procedia-Social and behavioral sciences, 174, 926-931.
Lamarche, B. J., Orazio, N. I., & Weitzman, M. D. (2010). The MRN complex in double-strand break repair and telomere maintenance. FEBS letters, 584(17), 3682-3695.
Lee, U.-S., Lee, D.-H., & Kim, E.-H. (2022). Characterization of γ-H2AX foci formation under alpha particle and X-ray exposures for dose estimation. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 3761.
Li, L., & Zou, L. (2005). Sensing, signaling, and responding to DNA damage: organization of the checkpoint pathways in mammalian cells. Journal of cellular biochemistry, 94(2), 298-306.
Marnef, A., & Legube, G. (2017). Organizing DNA repair in the nucleus: DSBs hit the road. Current opinion in cell biology, 46, 1-8.
McMenamin, P. G., Quayle, M. R., McHenry, C. R., & Adams, J. W. (2014). The production of anatomical teaching resources using three‐dimensional (3D) printing technology. Anatomical sciences education, 7(6), 479-486.
Mirza-Aghazadeh-Attari, M., Mohammadzadeh, A., Yousefi, B., Mihanfar, A., Karimian, A., & Majidinia, M. (2019). 53BP1: A key player of DNA damage response with critical functions in cancer. DNA repair, 73, 110-119.
Modesti, M., & Kanaar, R. (2001). DNA repair: spot (light) s on chromatin. Current Biology, 11(6), R229-R232.
Mognato, M., Girardi, C., Fabris, S., & Celotti, L. (2009). DNA repair in modeled microgravity: Double strand break rejoining activity in human lymphocytes irradiated with γ-rays. Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis, 663(1-2), 32-39.
Müssig, J. r., Clark, A., Hoermann, S., Loporcaro, G., Loporcaro, C., & Huber, T. (2020). Imparting materials science knowledge in the field of the crystal structure of metals in times of online teaching: a novel online laboratory teaching concept with an augmented reality application. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 2643-2650.
Noda, A., Hirai, Y., Hamasaki, K., Mitani, H., Nakamura, N., & Kodama, Y. (2012). Unrepairable DNA double-strand breaks that are generated by ionising radiation determine the fate of normal human cells. Journal of cell science, 125(22), 5280-5287.
Pinto, D. M. S., & Flaus, A. (2010). Structure and function of histone H2AX. Genome stability and human diseases, 55-78.
Polo, S. E., & Jackson, S. P. (2011). Dynamics of DNA damage response proteins at DNA breaks: a focus on protein modifications. Genes & development, 25(5), 409-433.
Redondo, E., Fonseca, D., Sánchez, A., & Navarro, I. (2013). New strategies using handheld augmented reality and mobile learning-teaching methodologies, in architecture and building engineering degrees. Procedia Computer Science, 25, 52-61.
Scalfani, V. F., & Vaid, T. P. (2014). 3D printed molecules and extended solid models for teaching symmetry and point groups. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(8), 1174-1180.
Shao, Y.-H., Tsai, K., Kim, S., Wu, Y.-J., & Demissie, K. (2020). Exposure to tomographic scans and cancer risks. JNCI cancer spectrum, 4(1), pkz072.
Shibata, A., & Jeggo, P. A. (2020). Roles for 53BP1 in the repair of radiation-induced DNA double strand breaks. DNA repair, 93, 102915.
Sosa, O., Salinas, J., & De Benito, B. (2022). Emerging technologies (ETs) in education: A systematic review of the literature published between 2006 and 2016. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 2017, vol. 12, num. 5, p. 128-149.
Ström, L., Lindroos, H. B., Shirahige, K., & Sjögren, C. (2004). Postreplicative recruitment of cohesin to double-strand breaks is required for DNA repair. Molecular cell, 16(6), 1003-1015.
Turkan, Y., Radkowski, R., Karabulut-Ilgu, A., Behzadan, A. H., & Chen, A. (2017). Mobile augmented reality for teaching structural analysis. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 34, 90-100.
Ünal, E., Arbel-Eden, A., Sattler, U., Shroff, R., Lichten, M., Haber, J. E., & Koshland, D. (2004). DNA damage response pathway uses histone modification to assemble a double-strand break-specific cohesin domain. Molecular cell, 16(6), 991-1002.
Wang, B., Matsuoka, S., Carpenter, P. B., & Elledge, S. J. (2002). 53BP1, a mediator of the DNA damage checkpoint. Science, 298(5597), 1435-1438.
Wei, X., Weng, D., Liu, Y., & Wang, Y. (2015). Teaching based on augmented reality for a technical creative design course. Computers & Education, 81, 221-234.
Ye, Z., Dun, A., Jiang, H., Nie, C., Zhao, S., Wang, T., & Zhai, J. (2020). The role of 3D printed models in the teaching of human anatomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC medical education, 20, 1-9.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Modern Journal of Health and Applied Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The users are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
